Fossils and carbon dating
You can help Amazing Discoveries reduce costs by upgrading or replacing your internet browser with one of the options below.We thank you in advance for partnering with us in this small but significant way. All methods of radioactive dating rely on three assumptions that may not necessarily be true: It is assumed that the rate of decay has remained constant over time.) Gen1Denying Evolution Evolution=Millions Of Years Your Imagination 2 Peter 3:5 "For this they are willingly ignorant of, that by the Word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water:" New Light on Radiometric Dating (Creation Moments.com)Most people find the subject of radiometric dating too technical to understand.Until recent years, scientists who believe in creation haven't had the necessary resources to explore radiometric dating in detail.They will argue that the clock was not reset if the age is too old, or that isotopes were selectively removed if the age turns out to be too young.In the study on the Hawaii lava flow cited above, it was argued that entrapment of excessive amounts of argon gas had made the samples appear older than they were. We could put forward the following counter arguments to the constancy of these assumptions: a) The constancy of cosmic ray bombardment might be questioned.The current high rate of entry might be a consequence of a disturbed post-Flood environment that altered the .
No scientist can guarantee that any sample can be considered a closed system unless it was isolated from its environment when it was formed.Evolutionists assume that the rate of cosmic bombardment of the atmosphere has always remained constant and that the rate of decay has remained constant.Scientists place great faith in this dating method, and yet more than 50% of radiocarbon dates from geological and archaeological samples of northeastern North America have been deemed unacceptable after investigation.Radiometric dating techniques are thus based on sound scientific principles, but rely on so many basic assumptions that Bible believers need not have their faith shattered by data derived from these techniques. What do rock layers on the Earth's crust tell us about our origins and the age of the earth?